From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davila v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 7, 1995
655 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

Nos. 95-574, 95-524.

June 7, 1995.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Barbara S. Levenson, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Mark C. Katzef, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.


CONFESSION OF ERROR


As the State properly concedes, the trial court erred in denying the appellants' motions for return of property. After the State voluntarily terminated the prosecutions of the appellants herein by announcing that it would bring "no action", the appellants were released and their cases were closed. Thereafter, the appellants properly moved to have their property returned, which motions were denied by the trial court, contrary to the provisions of Section 790.08(3), Florida Statutes (1993).

"While we understand and may share the lower court's reluctance to do so, the mandatory terms of Section 790.08(3), Florida Statutes" require that the motions filed by the appellants herein be granted. See Carneiro v. State, 464 So.2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Reversed.


Summaries of

Davila v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 7, 1995
655 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Davila v. State

Case Details

Full title:IVAN DAVILA AND TOMAS MATOS, APPELLANTS, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 7, 1995

Citations

655 So. 2d 245 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Berkman v. State

The State confesses error in the trial court's partial denial of appellant's motion to return property, which…