From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davila-Bajana v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 4, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-197 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-197 Erie.

December 4, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on September 1, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 22], filed on August 20, 2007, recommended that Defendants' motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment [Doc. No. 14] be granted. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. Plaintiff was granted an extension until September 17, 2007 to file objections [Doc. No. 23]. Plaintiff filed objections on September 20, 2007 [Doc. No. 25]. After de novo review of the motion and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 4th day of December, 2007;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' motion to dismiss or in the alternative for summary judgment [Doc. No. 14] is GRANTED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 22] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on August 22, 2007, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Davila-Bajana v. Sherman

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 4, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-197 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2007)
Case details for

Davila-Bajana v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:JUAN DAVILA-BAJANA, Plaintiff, v. JAMES F. SHERMAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 4, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-197 Erie (W.D. Pa. Dec. 4, 2007)