From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davila-Bajana v. Holohan

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 8, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-253 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 8, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 04-253 Erie.

August 8, 2006


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on September 7, 2004, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Amended Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 45], filed on July 18, 2006, recommended that Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 16] be granted in part and denied in part. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Plaintiff by certified mail and on Defendants. Defendants filed objections on July 21, 2006 [Doc. No. 47]. After de novo review of the motion and documents in the case, together with the Amended Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 8th day of August, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 16] is GRANTED as to the FTCA claim and Eighth Amendment claim, and DENIED as to the retaliation claim.

The Amended Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 45] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on July 18, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Davila-Bajana v. Holohan

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Aug 8, 2006
Civil Action No. 04-253 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Davila-Bajana v. Holohan

Case Details

Full title:JUAN DAVILA-BAJANA, Plaintiff, v. TIM HOLOHAN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Aug 8, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 04-253 Erie (W.D. Pa. Aug. 8, 2006)