From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davies v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 1, 2013
410 S.W.3d 709 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. WD 75413.

2013-10-1

Jeffrey W. DAVIES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Daniel F. Kellogg, Judge. Kent E. Gipson, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Daniel F. Kellogg, Judge.


Kent E. Gipson, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Three: LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Presiding Judge, MARK D. PFEIFFER and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judges.

Order


PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Davies appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, which set forth numerous allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Davies contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claims. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Davies v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 1, 2013
410 S.W.3d 709 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Davies v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jeffrey W. DAVIES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 1, 2013

Citations

410 S.W.3d 709 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Citing Cases

Davies v. Pash

Petitioner appealed the court's decision to the Missouri Court of Appeals, which affirmed the decision. Doc.…