From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davidson v. Odell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1938
255 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

October 14, 1938.


Action to recover for personal services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendants as a result of which awards eventuated in condemnation proceedings. Order denying motion of appealing defendants to dismiss the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Answer may be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The complaint states a good cause of action at law ( James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd., 239 App. Div. 836; affd., 263 N.Y. 524), even though (which we do not decide) it may be insufficient to sustain a cause of action in equity. ( James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd., 256 N.Y. 298.) The doctrine of anticipatory breach is applicable to a contract for personal services. ( Kelly v. Security Mutual Life Ins. Co., 186 N.Y. 16, 19.) Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Davidson v. Odell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 14, 1938
255 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Davidson v. Odell

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK G. DAVIDSON, Respondent, v. JOHN ODELL and Others, Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 14, 1938

Citations

255 App. Div. 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Rozay v. Hegeman Steel Prods

A suit for anticipatory breach of an executory personal service contract is a recognized cause of action.…