From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davidson v. Deschutes Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 21, 2015
Case No. 6:15 CV 52-TC (D. Or. Jul. 21, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 6:15 CV 52-TC

07-21-2015

MARTIE DAVIDSON, Plaintiff, v. DESCHUTES COUNTY, JOHN & CAREN BURTON, CHRIS KABER & JENNIFER GASPARD, Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on June 24, 2015. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

Dated this 21 day of July, 2015.

/s/_________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davidson v. Deschutes Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 21, 2015
Case No. 6:15 CV 52-TC (D. Or. Jul. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Davidson v. Deschutes Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIE DAVIDSON, Plaintiff, v. DESCHUTES COUNTY, JOHN & CAREN BURTON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jul 21, 2015

Citations

Case No. 6:15 CV 52-TC (D. Or. Jul. 21, 2015)