From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davidson v. Barnhardt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2013
Case No. CV 11-7298 FMO (VBKx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. CV 11-7298 FMO (VBKx)

12-06-2013

PETER A. DAVIDSON, Plaintiff, v. GERTRUDE BARNHARDT, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's Order Re: Plaintiff's Motion for Terminating Sanctions, IT IS ADJUDGED that:

1. Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff Peter A. Davidson, Receiver for CanAm Capital Corporation and against defendants Taurus Financial Advisors, Ltd., an Alberta (Canada) corporation and Gertrude Barnhardt, a.k.a. Getie Barnhardt, jointly and severally, in the amount of $1,586,000.00 on plaintiff's first and second causes of action in his First Amended Complaint to avoid fraudulent transfers under Cal. Civ. Code §§ 3439.04(a)(1) and 3439.04(a)(2), plus prejudgment interest thereon at the statutory rate from September 2, 2011 to August 16, 2013, in the amount of $217,173.37, plus prejudgment interest at the rate of $304.16 per day from August 17, 2013, to the date that judgment is entered for a total prejudgment interest award of $250,935.13. The total judgment on the first and second causes of action is $1,836,935.13.

2. Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff Peter A. Davidson, Receiver for CanAm Capital Corporation and against defendant Gertrude Barnhardt, a.k.a. Getie Barnhardt, in the amount of $43,283 on plaintiff's sixth cause of action for conversion.

3. After entry, said judgment shall bear interest according to law.

________________

Fernando M. Olguin

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davidson v. Barnhardt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2013
Case No. CV 11-7298 FMO (VBKx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Davidson v. Barnhardt

Case Details

Full title:PETER A. DAVIDSON, Plaintiff, v. GERTRUDE BARNHARDT, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 6, 2013

Citations

Case No. CV 11-7298 FMO (VBKx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2013)

Citing Cases

Jerry Beeman & Pharmacy Servs., Inc. v. Caremark Inc.

"Thus, in determining whether the court should impose a terminating sanction against defendants, the key…

United States v. Pomrenke

Fed. R. Evid. 803(17). Several courts have concluded that the Kelley Blue Book falls into this hearsay…