Davidson v. Advisory of Civil

Full title: WILLIAM DAVIDSON, Plaintiff, v. ADVISORY OF CIVIL (THE COURT) N.Y.C. TO…

Court: United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: May 9, 2011

8:10-CV-1397 (N.D.N.Y. May. 9, 2011)

Opinion

8:10-CV-1397.

May 9, 2011

WILLIAM DAVIDSON Plaintiff, Pro Se # 1601 C/O H.Van R. Es, New York City, NY.

DAVID N. HURD, United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

DAVID HURD, District Judge

Plaintiff, William Davidson, commenced this civil rights action in November 2010, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Order dated January 6, 2011, plaintiff was afforded the opportunity to submit an amended complaint. The plaintiff has now submitted a purported amended complaint (Docket No. 6) which is rambling and incoherent. The Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, has filed a second Report-Recommendation and Order dated January 21, 2011, wherein he recommends that the action be dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to state a claim or to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P 8 and 10. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.

Based upon a careful review of the file, and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Treece, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects.See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. The amended complaint is DISMISSED;

2. The action is DISMISSED in its entirety; and

3. The Clerk is directed to serve the plaintiff with a copy of this order and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.