From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP v. Smirnov

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 8, 2016
145 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

12-08-2016

DAVIDOFF HUTCHER & CITRON LLP formerly known as Davidoff Malito & Hutcher LLP, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Ioori SMIRNOV, et al., Defendants–Respondents.

Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP, New York (Joseph N. Polito of counsel), for appellant. Law Office of Mario DeMarco, P.C., Port Chester (Mario DeMarco of counsel), for respondents.


Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP, New York (Joseph N. Polito of counsel), for appellant.

Law Office of Mario DeMarco, P.C., Port Chester (Mario DeMarco of counsel), for respondents.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, JHO), entered on or about September 10, 2015, deemed appeal from judgment, same court and JHO, entered September 16, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, awarded plaintiff $27,291.15 in unpaid legal fees and no prejudgment interest, unanimously modified, on the law, to award plaintiff $73,477.98 in unpaid fees, plus prejudgment interest of $28,299.74, for a total award of $101,777.72, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

The addition of prejudgment interest to plaintiff's award for unpaid legal fees under quantum meruit was mandatory (see CPLR 5001 ; Ash & Miller v. Freedman, 114 A.D.2d 823, 495 N.Y.S.2d 183 [1st Dept.1985] ). Moreover, where plaintiff was required to seek permission to withdraw, it was required to continue to zealously represent defendants until the court granted its motion to withdraw (Rules of Professional Conduct [22 NYCRR 1200.0 ] rule 1.16 [d], [e] ). Therefore, it was incorrect for the JHO to refuse to consider any value for plaintiff's work from the time it moved by order to show cause to withdraw. This is particularly true where plaintiff sought, but was denied, an adjournment of the trial date, and the court took six months to grant the application.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., RENWICK, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, FEINMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP v. Smirnov

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 8, 2016
145 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Davidoff Hutcher & Citron LLP v. Smirnov

Case Details

Full title:DAVIDOFF HUTCHER & CITRON LLP formerly known as Davidoff Malito & Hutcher…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 8, 2016

Citations

145 A.D.3d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 8296
41 N.Y.S.3d 881

Citing Cases

In re Wiener

Accordingly, unless this Court grants the Motion, the Firm cannot withdraw from its representation of the…