From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

David v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 16, 1976
228 S.E.2d 362 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

52339.

ARGUED JULY 12, 1976.

DECIDED JULY 16, 1976.

Probation revocation. Clarke Superior Court. Before Judge Barrow.

Guy B. Scott, Jr., for appellant.

Harry N. Gordon, District Attorney, B. Thomas Cook, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


In this appeal from the revocation of defendant's probation, the sole issue is whether the state produced legally sufficient evidence to authorize the court's finding that defendant violated a term of his probation.

The revocation petition alleged that defendant violated Georgia's public indecency statute by the lewd exposure of his sexual organs. Code § 26-2011 (b). At the hearing, the prosecution's chief witness positively identified defendant as the person who followed her to a sorority house, unzipped his pants, and exposed his penis to her. This testimony was sufficient to satisfy the requirement of "slight evidence" necessary to support a finding of a probationary violation. Dickerson v. State, 136 Ga. App. 885 ( 222 S.E.2d 649); Scott v. State, 131 Ga. App. 504 ( 206 S.E.2d 137).

Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., and Stolz, J., concur.


ARGUED JULY 12, 1976 — DECIDED JULY 16, 1976.


Summaries of

David v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 16, 1976
228 S.E.2d 362 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

David v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 16, 1976

Citations

228 S.E.2d 362 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
228 S.E.2d 362

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

See also Dutton v. Willis, 223 Ga. 209, 211 ( 154 S.E.2d 221, 234). This court recognized the "slight…

Hearing v. State

In Johnson v. State, 142 Ga. App. 124, 126 ( 235 S.E.2d 550) (1977) we held that "[i]t is therefore well…