From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

David v. Sirus Computer Solutions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 6, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02030-RPM (D. Colo. Mar. 6, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02030-RPM

03-06-2013

DIANE DAVID, Plaintiff, v. SIRUS COMPUTER SOLUTIONS, Defendant.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch

Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith
FTR Technician: Kathy Terasaki

Darold W. Killmer

Tiffany J. Drahota


William D. Nelson

David M. Hyams


COURTROOM MINUTES

Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment

1:58 p.m. Court in session.

Defendant's client representative Justin Sobey present. Court's preliminary remarks and states its understanding of the case based on its review of the pleadings. 2:05 p.m. Mr. Nelson describes business model of the defendant. Argument by Mr. Nelson. 2:31 p.m. Argument by Mr. Killmer. 2:49 p.m. Rebuttal argument by Mr. Nelson.

ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [32] / [34], is denied with respect to negligent and fraudulent misrepresentations claims and granted with respect to the promissory estoppel claim.

Discovery is reopened for 60 days (May 6, 2013).

2:55 p.m. Court in recess.

Hearing concluded. Total time: 57 min.


Summaries of

David v. Sirus Computer Solutions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 6, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02030-RPM (D. Colo. Mar. 6, 2013)
Case details for

David v. Sirus Computer Solutions

Case Details

Full title:DIANE DAVID, Plaintiff, v. SIRUS COMPUTER SOLUTIONS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 6, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02030-RPM (D. Colo. Mar. 6, 2013)