From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

David v. Lopez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1346 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-1346 JAM GGH P.

February 10, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On December 7, 2010, the undersigned ordered that service forms be sent to plaintiff to be filled out and returned to the court concerning plaintiff's American with Disabilities Act (ADA) claim against Warden Tilton. Plaintiff has informed the court that the warden during the relevant time was Tom Felker. However, the appropriate defendant is the present warden in his official capacity as this case is proceeding under the ADA. Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to return the service forms is granted but plaintiff's motion for clarification of the party names is denied.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's motion for an extension (Doc. 20) is granted and plaintiff is granted 28 days from service of this order to return the service forms.

2. Plaintiff's motion for clarification (Doc. 21) is denied.

DATED: February 10, 2011


Summaries of

David v. Lopez

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 10, 2011
No. CIV S-10-1346 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2011)
Case details for

David v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:DAVID M. DAVID, Plaintiff, v. C. LOPEZ, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 10, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-1346 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2011)