Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

David J. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

3:20-cv-00647-MK (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2021)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
David J. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

8 Citing cases

  1. Michael G. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

    3:21-cv-01516-MK (D. Or. Apr. 5, 2023)

    As this Court has observed, an “ALJ's mere recitation of a claimant's activities is insufficient to support rejection of the claimant's testimony as a matter of law.” David J. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 3:20-cv-00647-MK, 2021 WL 3509716, at *4 (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2021) (citation omitted). Other than stating that Plaintiff's activities undermine the Plaintiff's subjective symptom testimony, the ALJ failed to explain how any of the listed activities undermined his subjective symptom testimony.

  2. Susan V. v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin.

    6:20-cv-00907-CL (D. Or. Mar. 31, 2023)

    An "ALJ's mere recitation of a claimant's activities is insufficient to support rejection of the claimant's testimony as a matter of law." David J. v. Comm 'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., No, 3:20-cv-00647-MK, 2021 WL 3509716, at *4 (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2021) (citation omitted).

  3. Michael G. v. Comm'r Soc. Sec. Admin

    3:21-cv-01516-MK (D. Or. Mar. 6, 2023)

    As this Court has observed, an “ALJ's mere recitation of a claimant's activities is insufficient to support rejection of the claimant's testimony as a matter of law.” David J. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 3:20-cv-00647-MK, 2021 WL 3509716, at *4 (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2021) (citation omitted).

  4. Tami D. v. Kijakazi

    1:21-cv-00067-CWD (D. Idaho Sep. 13, 2022)

    David J. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 3:20-cv-00647-MK, 2021 WL 3509716, at *4 (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2021) (citation omitted).

  5. Stephanie M. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

    6:20-cv-01546-MK (D. Or. Jan. 12, 2022)

    David J. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 3:20-cv-00647-MK, 2021 WL 3509716, at *4 (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2021) (citation omitted).

  6. Cheyn R. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

    6:20-cv-01663-MK (D. Or. Dec. 7, 2021)

    David J. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 3:20-cv-00647-MK, 2021 WL 3509716, at *4 (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2021) (citation omitted). In other words, other than generally summarizing Plaintiff's activities, the ALJ failed to explain how any of the listed activities undermined his subjective symptom testimony.

  7. Catherine R. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

    1:20-cv-01503-MK (D. Or. Nov. 10, 2021)   Cited 5 times

    ” David J. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin., No. 3:20-cv-00647-MK, 2021 WL 3509716, at *4 (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2021) (citation omitted). In other words, other than generally summarizing Plaintiff's activities, the ALJ failed to explain how any of the listed activities undermined her subjective symptom testimony.

  8. Domonique P. v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

    1:20-cv-01831-MK (D. Or. Nov. 1, 2021)

    ., No. 3:20-cv-00647-MK, 2021 WL 3509716, at *4 (D. Or. Aug. 10, 2021) (citation omitted). In other words, other than generally summarizing Plaintiff's activities, the ALJ failed to explain how any of the listed activities undermined his subjective symptom testimony.