From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daugherty v. Procunier

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 29, 1972
456 F.2d 97 (9th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-2492.

February 29, 1972.

John E. Daugherty, in pro. per.

Evelle J. Younger, Cal. Atty. Gen., Joyce F. Nedde, Eugene Kaster, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.

Before CHAMBERS, KOELSCH and CHOY, Circuit Judges.


John E. Daugherty, a California state prisoner, brought this civil action against the Director of the California Department of Corrections and certain prison wardens, guards, and administrators alleging deprivation of his civil rights. His complaint, which was filed in the Northern District of California, was dismissed for improper venue and failure to state a claim.

All the defendants reside in the Eastern District of California, and the claim arose in that district. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), venue in non-diversity actions is proper ". . . only in the judicial district where all defendants reside, or in which the claim arose . . ." Therefore, venue was improper in the Northern District, and the complaint should have been dismissed without prejudice to Daughtery's renewing his suit in the proper district.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Daugherty v. Procunier

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 29, 1972
456 F.2d 97 (9th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Daugherty v. Procunier

Case Details

Full title:JOHN EDWARD DAUGHERTY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. R. K. PROCUNIER, DIRECTOR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 29, 1972

Citations

456 F.2d 97 (9th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. City of Paducah, Kentucky

Jones v. Bales, 58 F.R.D. 453 (D.C. Ga. 1972), aff'd 480 F.2d 805. 28 U.S.C. § 1391 requires that actions not…

Henderson v. Ind. Dep't of Corr.

28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). See Jones v. Bales, 58 F.R.D. 453 (N.D. Ga. 1972), aff'd, 480 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1973);…