From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daugherty v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 21, 2011
CASE NO. C 11-01285-SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. C 11-01285-SBA

11-21-2011

BYRON D. DAUGHERTY, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS UNION LLC; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC; CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.; and DOES 1 through 30, inclusive, Defendants.

JAMES J. BERGMANN (SBN 220447) Law Office of James J. Bergmann Attorney for Plaintiff BYRON D. DAUGHERTY TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576) R. TRAVIS CAMPBELL (SBN 271580) SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP Attorneys for Defendant Citibank, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.


JAMES J. BERGMANN (SBN 220447)

Law Office of James J. Bergmann

Attorney for Plaintiff

BYRON D. DAUGHERTY

TOMIO B. NARITA (SBN 156576)

R. TRAVIS CAMPBELL (SBN 271580)

SIMMONDS & NARITA LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

Citibank, N.A., successor in interest to

Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.

SECOND STIPULATION TO

EXTEND TIME TO FILE

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF

CITIBANK, N.A.'S MOTION

TO COMPEL ARBITRATION;

ORDER

Hon. Saundra Brown Armstrong

Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty ("Plaintiff") and Defendant Citibank, N.A., successor in interest to Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. ("Citibank") hereby stipulate to the following:

1. WHEREAS Citibank filed a Motion to Compel Arbitration on August 19, 2011(the "motion");

2. WHEREAS Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiff and Citibank filed on October 14, 2011, Plaintiff filed his opposition to the motion on October 14, 2011 and Citbank's amended reply in support of the motion was due on or before November 4, 2011 (see Doc. No. 39);

3. WHEREAS Pursuant to the stipulation between Plaintiff and Citibank filed on November 4, 2011, Citibank's amended reply in support of the motion was due on or before November 18, 2011 (see Doc. No. 41);

4. WHEREAS Due to the schedules of Citibank's client representative and Citibank's counsel, Citibank requires additional time to prepare its amended reply.

5. WHEREAS On November 15, 2011, Plaintiff agreed to allow Citibank to file its amended reply on or before December 2, 2011;

6. WHEREAS the requested extension of time will have no effect on the case schedule as the hearing for the motion is set for January 24, 2012;

7. THEREFORE Plaintiff and Citibank, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Citibank's deadline to file its amended reply in support of its Motion to Compel Arbitration is December 2, 2011.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Law Office of James J. Bergmann

James J. Bergmann

Attorney for Plaintiff Byron D. Daugherty

Simmonds & Narita LLP

R. Travis Campbell

Attorneys for Defendant Citibank, N.A.,

successor in interest to Citibank (South

Dakota), N.A.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERD.

SAUNDRA BROWN ARMSTRONG

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Daugherty v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 21, 2011
CASE NO. C 11-01285-SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Daugherty v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BYRON D. DAUGHERTY, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 21, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. C 11-01285-SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 21, 2011)