From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daugherty v. Bissell

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-cv-01931-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-01931-WYD-BNB.

April 23, 2010


ORDER


This matter arises on the Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order [Doc. # 75, filed 4/12/2010] (the "Motion"). The Motion seeks to modify the case schedule in view of additional defendants joined or to be joined in the suit, and it seeks to stay the designation of expert witnesses pending the determination of motions to dismiss. I held a hearing on the Motion this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

GRANTED insofar as the parties seek to modify the schedule to accommodate new parties. The existing expert disclosure deadlines are VACATED. A status/supplemental scheduling conference is set for June 18, 2010, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall submit a proposed revised scheduling order on or before June 16, 2010, addressing all pretrial scheduling and discovery matters which they believe should be revised in view of the changes in the case; and

DENIED insofar as it seeks an indefinite stay of expert designations pending a ruling on motions to dismiss.


Summaries of

Daugherty v. Bissell

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 23, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-cv-01931-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2010)
Case details for

Daugherty v. Bissell

Case Details

Full title:ANNE DAUGHERTY and BRIAN DAUGHERTY, Plaintiff, v. MARY ELIZABETH BISSELL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Apr 23, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-01931-WYD-BNB (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2010)