Opinion
3:11-CV-01436-ST
04-24-2012
CARL DAUENHAUER and LORES DAUENHAUER, husband and wife, also doing business as DAUENHAUER FARMS with an assumed name HDW and HAUER OF THE DAUEN, INC., an Oregon corporation with HDW, Plaintiffs, v. COLUMBIA RIVER BANK, an Oregon bank corporation and COLUMBIA STATE BANK, a banking corporation, Defendants.
ORDER
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#24) on February 22, 2012, in which she recommended the Court deny Plaintiffs' Motion (#9) to Remand. Plaintiffs filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988).
In their Objections, Plaintiffs reiterate the arguments contained in their Motion to Remand, Reply in support of their Motion to Remand, and stated at oral argument. This Court has carefully considered Plaintiffs' Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Stewart's Findings and Recommendation (#24) and DENIES Plaintiffs' Motion (#9) to Remand.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________
ANNA J. BROW
United States District Judge