From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Datatreasury Corp. v. Fiserv, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 13, 2016
2016-1229 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1229 2016-1230

10-13-2016

DATATREASURY CORPORATION, Appellant v. FISERV, INC., Appellee

EDWARD K. CHIN, Albritton Law Firm, Longview, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by DEREK TOD GILLILAND, Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, Daingerfield, TX; CHRISTIAN JOHN HURT, Dallas, TX. DAVID ALAN ROODMAN, Bryan Cave LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by ELIZABETH C. CARVER, EMMA CATHRENE HARTY, NICK E. WILLIAMSON; ROBERT GERARD LANCASTER, Santa Monica, CA.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. CBM2014-00087, CBM2014-00088. EDWARD K. CHIN, Albritton Law Firm, Longview, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by DEREK TOD GILLILAND, Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, Daingerfield, TX; CHRISTIAN JOHN HURT, Dallas, TX. DAVID ALAN ROODMAN, Bryan Cave LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by ELIZABETH C. CARVER, EMMA CATHRENE HARTY, NICK E. WILLIAMSON; ROBERT GERARD LANCASTER, Santa Monica, CA. Before MOORE, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

We deny the appeal as moot in light of our order in DataTreasury Corp. v. Fidelity National Information, No. 16-1046.


Summaries of

Datatreasury Corp. v. Fiserv, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Oct 13, 2016
2016-1229 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2016)
Case details for

Datatreasury Corp. v. Fiserv, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DATATREASURY CORPORATION, Appellant v. FISERV, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Oct 13, 2016

Citations

2016-1229 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2016)