From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Datacloud Techs. v. Metro Fibernet, LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 6, 2023
2:23-cv-01413-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01413-GMN-EJY

10-06-2023

DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. METRO FIBERNET, LLC, Defendant.

Pisanelli Bice pllc Debra L. Spinelli, Esq., Bar No. 9695 M. Magali Mercera, Esq., Bar No. 11742 James F. McDonough, III (GA 117088) (pro hac vice forthcoming) Jonathan R. Miller (GA 507179) (pro hac vice forthcoming) Rozier Hardt McDonough PLLC Attorneys for Plaintiff DataCloud Technologies, LLC


Pisanelli Bice pllc

Debra L. Spinelli, Esq., Bar No. 9695

M. Magali Mercera, Esq., Bar No. 11742

James F. McDonough, III (GA 117088)

(pro hac vice forthcoming)

Jonathan R. Miller (GA 507179)

(pro hac vice forthcoming)

Rozier Hardt McDonough PLLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff DataCloud Technologies, LLC

PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Plaintiff DataCloud Technologies, LLC (“DataCloud”), on behalf of Defendant Metro Fibernet, LLC (“Defendant”), hereby files this unopposed motion requesting this first extension of time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to DataCloud's Complaint.

This Motion is made and based on, the papers and pleadings on file herein, the following Memorandum of Points and Authorities, any and all exhibits thereto, and any and all oral argument this Court may require at the time of a hearing.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1(a), “[a] motion or stipulation to extend time must state the reasons for the extension requested and must inform the court of all previous extensions of the subject deadline the court granted.” In support of this agreed motion, DataCloud states as follows:

1. DataCloud filed its Complaint for Patent Infringement on September 11, 2023.

2. DataCloud served the Summons and Complaint on Defendant on September 22, 2023, which by rule requires Defendant to Answer or otherwise respond by October 13, 2023. See ECF. No. 8; Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1)(A)(1).

3. Defendant has requested a 30-day extension for its time to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint, which DataCloud does not oppose.

4. As Defendant's counsel has not yet appeared in this case, DataCloud has agreed to file this motion on Defendant's behalf.

Therefore, DataCloud moves to extend the time for Defendant to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint up to and including November 13, 2023.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Datacloud Techs. v. Metro Fibernet, LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 6, 2023
2:23-cv-01413-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Datacloud Techs. v. Metro Fibernet, LLC

Case Details

Full title:DATACLOUD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. METRO FIBERNET, LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 6, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01413-GMN-EJY (D. Nev. Oct. 6, 2023)