From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dastin v. Dastin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1976
54 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Opinion

October 25, 1976


In a matrimonial action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 3, 1975, which denied her motion to vacate a judgment of divorce or, in the alternative, to vacate a certain stipulation. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Special Term correctly concluded that plaintiff failed to set forth grounds sufficient to warrant relief from the stipulation of settlement entered into by her in open court, with counsel present, and after the terms of the stipulation had been explained to her (see Rado v Rado, 51 A.D.2d 811; Wilson v Wilson, 44 A.D.2d 667; Elyachar v Elyachar, 43 A.D.2d 832, 833). Gulotta, P.J., Hopkins, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dastin v. Dastin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 25, 1976
54 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)
Case details for

Dastin v. Dastin

Case Details

Full title:RUTH DASTIN, Appellant, v. NATHAN DASTIN, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 25, 1976

Citations

54 A.D.2d 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1976)

Citing Cases

Tetenbaum v. Tetenbaum

We affirm. Relief from a stipulation of settlement should only be granted upon a showing of good cause, such…