From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dassault Sys., S.A v. Childress

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 17, 2012
Case No. 2:09-CV-10534-LPZ-VMM (E.D. Mich. Aug. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 2:09-CV-10534-LPZ-VMM

08-17-2012

DASSAULT SYSTÈMES, S.A. A CORPORATION OF FRANCE Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. KEITH CHILDRESS d/b/a PRACTICAL CATIA A MICHIGAN RESIDENT Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

Douglas P. LaLone GLENN E. FORBIS (P52119) DOUGLAS P. LALONE (P45741) RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER, PLLC Attorneys for the Plaintiff


Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff


STIPULATED ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

PENDING SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Dassault Systèmes, S.A. and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Keith Childress, request a ninety (90) day stay of all proceedings in this matter, including Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant's August 16, 2012 deadline to file a Response to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's Petition for Grand Jury Investigation, and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff's August 17th deadline to file a Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's Order denying Defendant's Motions to Quash [DE:113] & Order denying Motion for Stay [DE: 114]. The purpose for the stay is to allow the parties to engage in further settlement discussions to attempt to resolve the instant case.

At the conclusion of the ninety days, the parties will report back to the Court on the progress of their settlement efforts and, should such efforts have failed, the parties will each have 10 days in which to file the aforementioned Response to Petition and Motion for Reconsideration.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The present action is stayed for a period of ninety (90) days.

______________

Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff

United States District Judge

Respectfully submitted,

By: Douglas P. LaLone

GLENN E. FORBIS (P52119)

DOUGLAS P. LALONE (P45741)

RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER, PLLC

Attorneys for the Plaintiff

By:

_________________

On behalf of Defendant


Summaries of

Dassault Sys., S.A v. Childress

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 17, 2012
Case No. 2:09-CV-10534-LPZ-VMM (E.D. Mich. Aug. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Dassault Sys., S.A v. Childress

Case Details

Full title:DASSAULT SYSTÈMES, S.A. A CORPORATION OF FRANCE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 17, 2012

Citations

Case No. 2:09-CV-10534-LPZ-VMM (E.D. Mich. Aug. 17, 2012)