Opinion
July, 1933.
Order limiting the payment of salaries during the pendency of the action affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
DASO v. CARLSON HOIST MACHINE COMPANY, INC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Summaries of
DASO v. CARLSON HOIST MACHINE COMPANY, INC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for
DASO v. CARLSON HOIST MACHINE COMPANY, INC
Case Details
Full title:GEORGE S. DASO, Suing for Himself as Director and Stockholder and on…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Jul 1, 1933
Citations
240 App. Div. 778 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)