From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dashti v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
May 4, 2012
NO. 4:11-CV-196-A (N.D. Tex. May. 4, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 4:11-CV-196-A

05-04-2012

HEATHER DASHTI, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER

Came on for consideration the above-captioned action wherein Heather Dashti is plaintiff and Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, is defendant. This is an action for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner denying plaintiff's claim for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. On April 9, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge issued his proposed findings and conclusions and his recommendation, and granted the parties until April 23, 2012, in which to file and serve objections. Plaintiff belatedly filed objections on April 25, 2012, and the Commissioner filed no response. After studying the filings of the parties, the magistrate judge's proposed findings and conclusions, and the applicable legal authorities, the court has decided to adopt the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and conclusions and accept his recommendation.

Therefore,

The court ORDERS that the decision of defendant that plaintiff was not entitled to disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act be, and is hereby, affirmed

_________________

JOHN McBRYDE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Dashti v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
May 4, 2012
NO. 4:11-CV-196-A (N.D. Tex. May. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Dashti v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:HEATHER DASHTI, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: May 4, 2012

Citations

NO. 4:11-CV-196-A (N.D. Tex. May. 4, 2012)

Citing Cases

Herrera v. Berryhill

Moreover, although arguing that their opinions indicate that Plaintiff's mental impairments are severe,…