From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DASH v. HIGHLAND HOSPITAL

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Oct 1, 2007
07-CV-6468L (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2007)

Opinion

07-CV-6468L.

October 1, 2007


DECISION AND ORDER


Plaintiff has requested permission to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and has met the statutory requirements. Accordingly, plaintiff's request to proceed as a poor person is hereby granted.

In addition, plaintiff's complaint has been reviewed by the Court with respect to the 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) criteria. The complaint is sufficient to survive this initial review. Because plaintiff will be proceeding in forma pauperis, service by the U.S. Marshal is directed.

Additionally, plaintiff has requested assignment of counsel. There is insufficient information before the Court at this time to make the necessary assessment of plaintiff's claims under the standards promulgated by Hendricks v. Coughlin, 114 F.3d 390, 392 (2d Cir. 1997), and Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1986), as issue has yet to be joined. Therefore plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice at this time. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to retain an attorney or press forward with this lawsuit pro se. 28 U.S.C. § 1654.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to file plaintiff's papers, and to cause the United States Marshal to serve copies of the Summons, Complaint, and this Order upon the named defendant without plaintiff's payment therefor, unpaid fees to be recoverable if this action terminates by monetary award in plaintiffs favor.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

DASH v. HIGHLAND HOSPITAL

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Oct 1, 2007
07-CV-6468L (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2007)
Case details for

DASH v. HIGHLAND HOSPITAL

Case Details

Full title:KAMIKA DASH, Plaintiff, v. HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Oct 1, 2007

Citations

07-CV-6468L (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 1, 2007)