From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

D'Ascanio v. Toyota Indus. Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 14, 2012
39 A.3d 1118 (Conn. 2012)

Opinion

2012-03-14

Emilio D'ASCANIO et al. v. TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORPORATION et al.

Paul D. Williams, Erich M. Sandler and James E. Hennessey, Hartford, in support of the petition. Jack G. Steigelfest, Hartford, in opposition.


Paul D. Williams, Erich M. Sandler and James E. Hennessey, Hartford, in support of the petition. Jack G. Steigelfest, Hartford, in opposition.

The petition by the defendants Toyota Material Handling USA, Inc., BT Prime Mover, Inc., and Summit Handling Systems, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 133 Conn.App. 420, 35 A.3d 388, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court's exclusion of *1119 expert testimony and refusal to grant a mistrial constituted an abuse of discretion?”


Summaries of

D'Ascanio v. Toyota Indus. Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 14, 2012
39 A.3d 1118 (Conn. 2012)
Case details for

D'Ascanio v. Toyota Indus. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Emilio D'ASCANIO et al. v. TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORPORATION et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

39 A.3d 1118 (Conn. 2012)
304 Conn. 907

Citing Cases

D'Ascanio v. Toyota Indus. Corp.

See D'Ascanio v. Toyota Industries Corp., 133 Conn.App. 420, 422 n. 2, 35 A.3d 388 (2012). We granted the…