Opinion
2:14-cv-00698-JE
09-01-2017
SATYA KRISHNA DASA, Petitioner, v. MARK NOOTH, Respondent.
ORDER
BROWN, Judge.
Magistrate Judge John Jelderks issued Findings and Recommendation (#90) on July 14, 2017, in which he recommends the Court deny Petitioner Satya Krishna Dasa's Amended Petition (#39) for Writ of Habeas Corpus, dismiss this matter with prejudice, and decline to issue a Certificate of Appealability. Petitioner filed timely Objections to the Findings and Recommendation. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
When any party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). See also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9 Cir. 2009); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9 Cir. 2003)(en banc).
This Court has carefully considered Petitioner's Objections and concludes they do not provide a basis to modify the Findings and Recommendation. The Court also has reviewed the pertinent portions of the record de novo and does not find any error in the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks's Findings and Recommendation (#90) and, therefore, DENIES the Amended Petition (#39) for Writ of Habeas Corpus, DISMISSES this matter with prejudice, and DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 1st day of September, 2017.
/s/ Anna J. Brown
ANNA J. BROWN
United States Senior District Judge