From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darrow v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Mar 17, 2015
458 S.W.3d 461 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 101533

03-17-2015

Nancy Darrow, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Matthew Huckeby, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Chris Koster, Andrew C. Hooper, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Matthew Huckeby, 1010 Market St., Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Andrew C. Hooper, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Lisa Van Amburg, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Nancy Darrow (Movant) appeals the motion court's judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, her motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Darrow v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Mar 17, 2015
458 S.W.3d 461 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Case details for

Darrow v. State

Case Details

Full title:Nancy Darrow, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Mar 17, 2015

Citations

458 S.W.3d 461 (E.D. Mo. 2015)