From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darr v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 5, 2017
534 S.W.3d 247 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

WD 80093

09-05-2017

David R. DARR, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Kevin L. Schriener, Clayton, MO, Counsel for Appellant. Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.


Kevin L. Schriener, Clayton, MO, Counsel for Appellant.

Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, Counsel for Respondent.

Before Division Two: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Presiding Judge, Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judge, Karen King Mitchell, Judge

ORDER

Per Curiam:

David R. Darr, Sr., appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Darr v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 5, 2017
534 S.W.3d 247 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Darr v. State

Case Details

Full title:David R. DARR, Sr., Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Sep 5, 2017

Citations

534 S.W.3d 247 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Darr v. Vandergriff

After an evidentiary hearing, the motion court denied Petitioner's amended motion (Doc. 17-3 at 52-56). On…