Darling v. Stewart

Full title: Richard Samuel DARLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART; Dave…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 21, 2001

3 F. App'x 644 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

3 Fed.Appx. 644 (9th Cir. 2001) Richard Samuel DARLING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART; Dave Stevenson; T. Smith, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-17287. D.C. No. CV-97-2671-ROS. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 21, 2001

Submitted February 12, 2001. ¹

1 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ²

2 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Richard Samuel Darling, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the judgment of the district court dismissing with prejudice his civil rights complaint pursuant to the screening provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ³ We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's orders filed on December 19, 1998 and September 13, 1999.

3 Defendants made no appearance before the district court or in this court.

AFFIRMED.