From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darling v. Douglas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 3, 2011
No. Civ. 09-3798 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. Civ. 09-3798 JSC

11-03-2011

ESTHER DARLING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TOBY DOUGLAS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF

DECLARATIONS (Dkt. No. 391)

Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' "Motion for Further Proceedings Regarding Motion to Compel; Motion to Strike." (Dkt. No. 391.) For the reasons explained at oral argument on November 3, 2011, Plaintiffs' Motion is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiffs' argument goes to the weight the district court should give to the declaration statements in considering Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction rather than admissibility.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Darling v. Douglas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 3, 2011
No. Civ. 09-3798 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Darling v. Douglas

Case Details

Full title:ESTHER DARLING, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TOBY DOUGLAS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 3, 2011

Citations

No. Civ. 09-3798 JSC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)