From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darienzo v. Selbern Shoe Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 1973
41 A.D.2d 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

March 5, 1973


In a personal injury action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 28, 1971, which denied its motion to dismiss all the causes of action in the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over its person (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 8), without prejudice to interposition of the jurisdictional objection in its answer. Order reversed, without costs, and motion remitted to Special Term for a hearing solely on the question of jurisdiction and a new determination. The motion papers presented sharp questions of fact concerning the essential jurisdictional requirements of CPLR 302. It is our opinion that in such a situation it is preferable to order an immediate hearing on the factual questions, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [c]), rather than await the trial for determination thereof. Shapiro, Acting P.J., Gulotta, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Darienzo v. Selbern Shoe Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 1973
41 A.D.2d 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

Darienzo v. Selbern Shoe Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THERESA DARIENZO et al., Respondents, v. SELBERN SHOE COMPANY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1973

Citations

41 A.D.2d 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Chamberlain v. Peak

Here, the papers submitted by the parties present a sharp question of fact relating to the extent of…

Brown v. Sagamore Hotel

Nor are we able to determine, on this record, whether the alleged service upon an agent of Kennington…