From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dareus v. Jane Doe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 31, 2022
335 So. 3d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2641

03-31-2022

Marcell DAREUS, Petitioner, v. Jane DOE, Respondent.

Amy D. Shield and Roger Levine of Shield & Levine, P.A., Boca Raton; Joel H. Feldman of Johnson, Ritchey & Feldman, P.A., Boca Raton, for Petitioner. J.D. Dowell of Pitsci, Dowell & Markowitz, Tampa, for Respondent.


Amy D. Shield and Roger Levine of Shield & Levine, P.A., Boca Raton; Joel H. Feldman of Johnson, Ritchey & Feldman, P.A., Boca Raton, for Petitioner.

J.D. Dowell of Pitsci, Dowell & Markowitz, Tampa, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

Lewis, Kelsey, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dareus v. Jane Doe

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Mar 31, 2022
335 So. 3d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Dareus v. Jane Doe

Case Details

Full title:Marcell DAREUS, Petitioner, v. Jane DOE, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

335 So. 3d 819 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)