DARE v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION

Full title: JOHN DARE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 3, 2006

Civil Action No. 05-257 Erie (W.D. Pa. May. 3, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-257 Erie.

May 3, 2006

MEMORANDUM ORDER

SEAN MCLAUGHLIN, District Judge

This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on September 9, 2005, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 231, filed on April 12, 2006, recommended that Petitioner's Petition be denied. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondents. Petitioner filed objections [Doc. No. 261 on April 24, 2006. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 3^rd day of May, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. No. I] is DENIED.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 231 of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on April 12, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.