From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dare v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE .
Mar 17, 2015
458 S.W.3d 462 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 101061

03-17-2015

Michael Dare, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Matthew Huckeby, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.


Matthew Huckeby, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Lawrence E. Mooney, P.J., Clifford H. Ahrens, J., and Lisa Van Amburg, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Dare appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

Dare v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE .
Mar 17, 2015
458 S.W.3d 462 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Case details for

Dare v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael Dare, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE .

Date published: Mar 17, 2015

Citations

458 S.W.3d 462 (E.D. Mo. 2015)