AFFIRMED. See Darden v. State, 641 So.2d 431, 432 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); DiGuilio v. State, 419 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986); Hines v. State, 358 So.2d 183 (Fla. 1978). PETERSON, CJ., SHARP, W., and GOSHORN, JJ., concur.

Subsequent to the issuance of the mandate, the state filed a motion to recall mandate and for rehearing, asserting that its previous confession of error was itself erroneous. It had failed to realize that the holding of Arnette was based upon the pre-1990 version of section 958.14. Under amended section 958.14, a youthful offender can be sentenced in excess of six years after revocation of probation if the violation was substantive rather than technical. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1995); Dunbar v. State, 664 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Darden v. State, 641 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Reeves v. State, 605 So.2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We recalled the mandate and accepted the motion for rehearing as timely filed and received no response from the defendant.

Since Dunbar's probation was revoked for technical violations, he can only be sentenced to a total of six years. State v. Arnette, 604 So.2d 482 (Fla. 1992); Young v. State, 654 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Darden v. State, 641 So.2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). A youthful offender can be sentenced in excess of six years after revocation of probation if the violation was substantive. See § 958.14, Fla. Stat. (1993); Reeves v. State, 605 So.2d 562 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992).