From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dardarian v. Officemax North America, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 23, 2011
Case No. 4:11-cv-00947 SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 4:11-cv-00947 SBA Case No. 4:11-cv-002233 SBA

11-23-2011

NANCY DARDARIAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICEMAX NORTH AMERICA, INC., an Ohio corporation, Defendant. NATHAN THOMS, individually and on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. OFFICEMAX NORTH AMERICA, INC., an Ohio corporation; and DOES 2 through 50, inclusive, Defendants.

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Michael J. Burns Giovanna A. Ferrari Attorneys for Defendant OFFICEMAX NORTH AMERICA, INC. OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED Jeffrey D. Neumeyer Elham Marder Attorneys for Defendant OFFICEMAX NORTH AMERICA, INC. HOFFMAN & LAZEAR H. Tim Hoffman Arthur W. Lazear Chad A. Saunders Attorneys for Plaintiff NANCY DARDARIAN Gene J. Stonebarger Richard D. Lambert Attorneys for Plaintiff NATHAN THOMS


SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

Michael J. Burns (SBN 172614)

Giovanna Alicia Ferrari (SBN 229871)

Jeffrey D. Neumeyer (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Elham Marder (SBN 251981)

OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED

Attorneys for Defendant

OFFICEMAX NORTH AMERICA, INC.

OTHER ATTORNEY INFORMATION

ON NEXT PAGE

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING AMENDMENT TO CIVIL

CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE MINUTES; DECLARATION OF GIOVANNA A. FERRARI IN SUPPORT THEREOF

Judge: Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong

H. Tim Hoffman (SBN 049141)

Arthur W. Lazear (SBN 083603)

Chad A. Saunders (SBN 257810)

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR

Attorneys for Plaintiff

NANCY DARDARIAN

Gene J. Stonebarger (SBN 209461)

Richard D. Lambert (SBN 251148)

STONEBARGER LAW

Attorneys for Plaintiff

NATHAN THOMS

Pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Plaintiff Nancy Dardarian ("Dardarian"), Plaintiff Nathan Thoms ("Thoms") and Defendant OfficeMax North America, Inc. ("OfficeMax") (collectively, the "Parties") stipulate to amend the civil case management conference minutes to reflect the certain dates agreed to by the Parties and the Court during the November 16, 2011 case management conference, namely: (1) 12/16/2011 as the last day to file a consolidated amended complaint; and (2) 7/31/2012 as the date of the hearing on class certification motions, for the reasons stated in the Declaration of Giovanna A. Ferrari attached hereto as Exhibit A.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

By __________

Michael J. Burns

Giovanna A. Ferrari

Attorneys for Defendant

OFFICEMAX NORTH AMERICA, INC.

OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED

By ___________

Jeffrey D. Neumeyer

Elham Marder

Attorneys for Defendant

OFFICEMAX NORTH AMERICA, INC.

HOFFMAN & LAZEAR

By __________

H. Tim Hoffman

Arthur W. Lazear

Chad A. Saunders

Attorneys for Plaintiff

NANCY DARDARIAN

STONEBARGER LAW

By __________

Gene J. Stonebarger

Richard D. Lambert

Attorneys for Plaintiff

NATHAN THOMS
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

Hon. Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong


Summaries of

Dardarian v. Officemax North America, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 23, 2011
Case No. 4:11-cv-00947 SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Dardarian v. Officemax North America, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NANCY DARDARIAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

Case No. 4:11-cv-00947 SBA (N.D. Cal. Nov. 23, 2011)