From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Darcuiel v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons Atwater

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 6, 2015
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01664-JLT (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2015)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01664-JLT

11-06-2015

HAAMID DARCUIEL, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ATWATER, Respondent.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE PETITION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

In this case, the petition alleges that the Bureau of Prisons wrongfully denied Petitioner's request for home detention rather than placement in a half-way house at the end of his sentence, which was due to expire on March 11, 2015. (Doc. 1, p. 2). On August 26, 2015, the Court issued an order denying one of Petitioner's motions. (Doc. 17). That order was served on Petitioner but returned to the Court on September 17, 2015. In the meanwhile, the Court has verified that Petitioner has been released.

The case or controversy requirement of Article III of the Federal Constitution deprives the Court of jurisdiction to hear moot cases. Iron Arrow Honor Soc'y v. Heckler, 464 U.S. 67, 70 (1983); N.A.A.C.P., Western Region v. City of Richmond, 743 F.2d 1346, 1352 (9th Cir. 1984). A case becomes moot if the "the issues presented are no longer 'live' or the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome." Murphy v. Hunt, 455 U.S. 478, 481 (1982). The Federal Court is "without power to decide questions that cannot affect the rights of the litigants before them." North Carolina v. Rice, 404 U.S. 244, 246 (1971) per curiam, quoting Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Hayworth, 300 U.S. 227, 240-241 (1937).

In preparation for drafting a decision on the merits, the Court consulted the Bureau of Prisons' electronic database and determined that Petitioner was released from custody on March 11, 2015. Since the only issued raised in the petition is Petitioner's placement immediately prior to the completion of his sentence, it would appear that the petition is moot and should be dismissed. However, prior to dismissing the petition, the Court will afford the parties an opportunity to show cause why it should not be dismissed

ORDER

For the foregoing reasons, the Court HEREBY ORDERS as follows:

1. Within 30 days , the parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Petition should not be dismissed as moot.

Petitioner is advised that his failure to comply with this order may result in an order that the Petition be dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 110. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 6 , 2015

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Darcuiel v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons Atwater

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 6, 2015
Case No.: 1:14-cv-01664-JLT (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Darcuiel v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons Atwater

Case Details

Full title:HAAMID DARCUIEL, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ATWATER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 6, 2015

Citations

Case No.: 1:14-cv-01664-JLT (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2015)