From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danziger v. Shaknaitis

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 22, 1993
636 A.2d 846 (Conn. 1993)

Opinion

(14872)

Decided December 22, 1993


The plaintiff Rita Johnson's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 6 (AC 12009), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff's motion to amend the return date, having been filed after the original return date, could not be granted pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 52-72?"

It is hereby ordered, sua sponte, that the judgment of the Appellate Court in the captioned matter be summarily reversed in light of this court's decision in Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax Review, 229 Conn. 618, 626 (1994), and the case is remanded to that court with direction to remand the case to the trial court with direction to vacate its order granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment as to Rita Johnson. July 7, 1994.


Albert Carocci, in support of the petition.


Summaries of

Danziger v. Shaknaitis

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dec 22, 1993
636 A.2d 846 (Conn. 1993)
Case details for

Danziger v. Shaknaitis

Case Details

Full title:STEWART S. DANZIGER ET AL. v. IDA J. SHAKNAITIS

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Dec 22, 1993

Citations

636 A.2d 846 (Conn. 1993)
228 Conn. 914