From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danzig v. Virgin Isle Hotel, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 1, 1961
286 F.2d 960 (3d Cir. 1961)

Opinion

No. 13252.

Argued January 23, 1961.

Decided February 1, 1961. Rehearing Denied March 22, 1961.

Appeal from the District Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John; Walter A. Gordon, Judge.

See also 278 F.2d 580.

William W. Bailey, Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, Virgin Islands, for appellant.

Joseph G. Blum, New York City, for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action brought to recover for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered from a fall in defendant's hotel. The parties are not in dispute about the principle of law which governs such a case and each agrees with the general statement of the obligation of the proprietor of premises to a business guest found in the Restatement of Torts. The disputed point is whether there was sufficient evidence of violation of the duty of care to justify a jury verdict for the plaintiff. It is not a very strong case but we think there is enough to justify its submission to a jury. It was so submitted and the jury decided for the plaintiff.

The judgment will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Danzig v. Virgin Isle Hotel, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 1, 1961
286 F.2d 960 (3d Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Danzig v. Virgin Isle Hotel, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Sarah DANZIG and Robert L. Danzig v. VIRGIN ISLE HOTEL, INC., Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 1, 1961

Citations

286 F.2d 960 (3d Cir. 1961)