From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danso v. Hester & Cook Design Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 12, 2024
24 Civ. 00203 (JHR) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2024)

Opinion

24 Civ. 00203 (JHR)

01-12-2024

CHARITY DANSO, Plaintiff, v. HESTER & COOK DESIGN GROUP, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

JENNIFER H. REARDEN, DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff alleges that Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired customers and, thus, violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq. By separate Order today, the Court is referring this case to the assigned Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial Purposes, including settlement.

In addition, to conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties must discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties so consent, counsel shall file on ECF a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/forms/consent-proceed-us-magistrate-judge.

If the parties do so, and the Court so orders the form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before the undersigned. There will be no adverse consequences if the parties do not consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Danso v. Hester & Cook Design Grp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 12, 2024
24 Civ. 00203 (JHR) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Danso v. Hester & Cook Design Grp.

Case Details

Full title:CHARITY DANSO, Plaintiff, v. HESTER & COOK DESIGN GROUP, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 12, 2024

Citations

24 Civ. 00203 (JHR) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 12, 2024)