From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danoff v. Danoff

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 31, 1987
503 So. 2d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 4-86-1659.

February 11, 1987. Rehearing and Clarification Denied March 31, 1987.

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Gene Fischer, Judge.

Steven N. Abramowitz, Miami, for appellant.

Jesse S. Faerber and Stacie L. Cohen of Fenster and Faerber, Plantation, for appellee-Danoff.


We find that the trial court erred in holding that appellant was responsible for the entire balance of the medical bill and the tuition in question, as these obligations were not incorporated into the final judgment. See Aylward v. Aylward, 420 So.2d 660 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). See also Agudo v. Agudo, 411 So.2d 249 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). However, we find that the terms of the final judgment encompass the medical bill even though it accrued prior to the final judgment, hold that appellant is responsible for that portion of the medical bill covered by the insurance and medical payment provisions of the final judgment, and affirm to that extent. We also affirm the portion of the trial court's order regarding visitation and find no error in the trial court's failure to award appellant attorney's fees.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Danoff v. Danoff

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 31, 1987
503 So. 2d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Danoff v. Danoff

Case Details

Full title:BURTON DANOFF, APPELLANT, v. LINDA A. DANOFF, ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 31, 1987

Citations

503 So. 2d 923 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Dirienzo-Gluhareff v. Gluhareff

This issue was waived by the appellant in the proceedings in the trial court. See id. (stating that decree…