From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dann v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 20, 1958
253 F.2d 28 (6th Cir. 1958)

Opinion

No. 13270.

February 20, 1958.

Dann, Rosenbaum Bloom, Detroit, Mich., Sol A. Dann, Detroit, Mich., of counsel, for appellant.

Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City, Bodman, Longley, Bogle, Armstrong Dahling, Detroit, Mich., White Case and Ralph L. McAfee, New York City, for appellees.

Before McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.


It appearing to the Court from the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties that, as appellees concede, the order of the District Court dismissing appellants' complaint as amended and supplemented, for non-compliance with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., was not a dismissal of the action and is not appealable, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and that appellants may yet file, by leave of Court pursuant to Rule 15, an amended complaint which will meet the requirements of Rule 8;

It is ordered that the appeal is hereby dismissed and the cause remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Dann v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 20, 1958
253 F.2d 28 (6th Cir. 1958)
Case details for

Dann v. Studebaker-Packard Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Sol A. DANN, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek, Plaintiffs-Appellants…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 20, 1958

Citations

253 F.2d 28 (6th Cir. 1958)

Citing Cases

United States v. Frank B. Killian Company

The order from which this appeal was taken is "that the complaint herein is hereby dismissed". It does not…

Koll v. Wayzata State Bank

And it is clear that a dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 8 would not be an appealable order since it would be…