From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dann v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1912
99 N.E. 1106 (N.Y. 1912)

Opinion

Argued October 1, 1912

Decided October 15, 1912

Stewart F. Hancock, Levi S. Chapman, John W. Hogan and George B. Curtis for appellants.

Charles P. Ryan for respondents.


Order reversed, with costs in all courts, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on dissenting opinion of FOOTE, J., below. First and fourth questions certified answered in the affirmative; third question answered in the negative; second question not answered.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, VANN, HISCOCK, CHASE and COLLIN, JJ. Not voting: WILLARD BARTLETT, J.


Summaries of

Dann v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 15, 1912
99 N.E. 1106 (N.Y. 1912)
Case details for

Dann v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD H. DANN et al., Respondents, v . MANNING C. PALMER et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 15, 1912

Citations

99 N.E. 1106 (N.Y. 1912)
99 N.E. 1106

Citing Cases

Hydraulic Power Co. v. Pettebone-Cataract P. Co.

The conclusion here reached is supported by former decisions and reasoning in the opinions of the appellate…

Famous Manufacturing Co. v. Gibson

In other words, I feel that the specification as to time when such proposed findings may be presented is not…