From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danisco U.S. Inc. v. Novozymes

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 15, 2014
12-CV-04502 RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2014)

Opinion

          DAVID K. TELLEKSON, EWA M. DAVISON, FENWICK & WEST LLP Seattle, WA, VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI, FENWICK & WEST LLP, Silicon Valley Center, Mountain View, CA, Attorneys for Defendants, NOVOZYMES A/S and, NOVOZYMES NORTH AMERICA, INC.

          GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Tracey B. Davies, Admitted Pro Hac Vice, Michael A. Valek, Admitted Pro Hac Vice, H. Mark Lyon, Attorneys for Plaintiff.


          ORDER STIPULATED REQUEST FOR RELIEF FROM CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE

          RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.

         Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 16-2(d), Plaintiff Danisco U.S. Inc. ("Danisco") and Defendants Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. (collectively, "Novozymes") hereby submit this Stipulated Request for Relief from Case Management Schedule. The parties respectfully request that the Court extend the date for the Case Management Conference and other case deadlines by 30 days.

         Danisco and Novozymes are working diligently to finalize an agreement that will resolve this action. The parties expect to conclude these efforts within 30 day. To facilitate that effort and to avoid the unnecessary expenditure of both the parties' and the Court's resources, the parties seek to extend all current case deadlines by 30 days. Additionally, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties further stipulate that Novozymes may respond to the complaint on or before September 12, 2014. The current and proposed deadlines are indicated in the chart below.

         Event Current Date Proposed Change Case Management September 4, October 6, 204 Conference 2014 October 9, 2014 Deadline for parties to file August 28, 2014 October 2, 2014 Case Management September 29, 2014 Conference Statement (or 7 days before rescheduled Case Management Conference) Deadline for parties to August 14, 2014 September 18, 2014 Conduct Rule 26(f) conference September 15, 2014 (or 21 days before rescheduled Case Management Conference) Event Current Date Stipulated Change Deadline for Novozymes to August 22, 2014 September 12, 2014 respond to complaint

         For the foregoing reasons and for the reasons explained in the declaration of virginia K. DeMarchi, the parties respectfully request that the court grant this motion and enter their [Proposed] Order Granting Stipulated Request for relief from Case Management Schedule.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

          PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

         The Stipulated Request for Relief from Case Management Schedule is GRANTED. The Court shall issue a separate scheduling order consistent with the parties' stipulated request.


Summaries of

Danisco U.S. Inc. v. Novozymes

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division
Aug 15, 2014
12-CV-04502 RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2014)
Case details for

Danisco U.S. Inc. v. Novozymes

Case Details

Full title:DANISCO U.S. INC., Plaintiff, v. NOVOZYMES A/S and NOVOZYMES NORTH…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California, San Francisco Division

Date published: Aug 15, 2014

Citations

12-CV-04502 RS (N.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2014)