From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Danielson v. Flores (In re Flores)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec 19, 2012
704 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11–55452.

2012-12-19

In re Cesar Ivan FLORES; Ana Maria Flores, Debtors. Rod Danielson, Trustee–Appellant, v. Cesar Ivan Flores; Ana Maria Flores, Debtors–Appellees.

Nancy Bonaccorso Clark, Borowitz & Clark, LLP, West Covina, CA, for Debtors–Appellees. Elizabeth Anne Schneider, Office of Rod Danielson, Chapter 13 Trustee, Riverside, CA, for Trustee–Appellant.


Nancy Bonaccorso Clark, Borowitz & Clark, LLP, West Covina, CA, for Debtors–Appellees. Elizabeth Anne Schneider, Office of Rod Danielson, Chapter 13 Trustee, Riverside, CA, for Trustee–Appellant.
Rod Danielson, pro se.

D.C. No. 6:10–29956–MJ.

ORDER


KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Danielson v. Flores (In re Flores)

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec 19, 2012
704 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Danielson v. Flores (In re Flores)

Case Details

Full title:In re Cesar Ivan FLORES; Ana Maria Flores, Debtors. Rod Danielson…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Dec 19, 2012

Citations

704 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

In re Ballew

Despite the Bankruptcy Code providing a statutory formula for calculating the applicable commitment period,…

Danielson v. Flores (In re Flores)

A divided panel of this court reversed, reasoning that Lanning is not clearly irreconcilable with Kagenveama…