From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. United States

United States District Court, D. Maine
May 19, 2022
2:18-cv-00063-GZS (D. Me. May. 19, 2022)

Opinion

2:18-cv-00063-GZS 2:21-cv-000312-GZS

05-19-2022

RICHARD DANIELS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDERING AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

George Z. Singal United States District Judge

On April 8, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 1105). On April 26, 2022, Petitioner filed his objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 1113).

The Court has made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision and concurs with the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in that order. As a result, the Court determines that no further proceedings are necessary with respect to this Recommended Decision.

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Recommended Decision (ECF No. 1105) is hereby AFFIRMED.

2. An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 cases.

3. Petitioner's Motion for habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 1071) is hereby DENIED.

4. A certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases is hereby DENIED because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Daniels v. United States

United States District Court, D. Maine
May 19, 2022
2:18-cv-00063-GZS (D. Me. May. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Daniels v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD DANIELS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: May 19, 2022

Citations

2:18-cv-00063-GZS (D. Me. May. 19, 2022)