From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. Steinmetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

February, 1934.


Order denying motion for judgment on the pleadings under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Davis, J., concurs on the ground that whatever remedy appellant had was under rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and not under rule 112. No grounds for dismissal based on the latter rule were presented in the motion papers.


Summaries of

Daniels v. Steinmetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Daniels v. Steinmetz

Case Details

Full title:ODALINE SIMONS DANIELS, for and on Behalf of Herself and All Stockholders…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)