Opinion
No. 05-05-00844-CR
Opinion Filed August 15, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F05-48759-KN. Affirmed.
Before Justices WRIGHT, MOSELEY, and LANG.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
James Richard Daniels waived a jury and pleaded guilty to robbery. The trial court sentenced appellant to fifteen years' imprisonment and assessed a $5000 fine. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). In a pro se response to counsel's brief, appellant contends he did not receive effective assistance of counsel and his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.