From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 17, 2012
88 So. 3d 148 (Fla. 2012)

Opinion

No. SC12–364.

2012-04-17

Craig B. DANIELS, Petitioner v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.


The petitioner has filed a petition for writ of prohibition with the Court. To the extent the petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition directed towards the district court, the petition is denied because the petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So.2d 850 (Fla.1992); English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla.1977). To the extent the petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition directed toward the circuit court, the petition is denied as successive. See Jenkins v. Wainwright, 322 So.2d 477, 478 (Fla.1975)(declaring that once a petitioner seeks relief in a particular court by means of a petition for extraordinary writ, he has picked his forum and is not entitled to a second or third opportunity for the same relief by the same writ in a different court).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Daniels v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 17, 2012
88 So. 3d 148 (Fla. 2012)
Case details for

Daniels v. State

Case Details

Full title:Craig B. DANIELS, Petitioner v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Apr 17, 2012

Citations

88 So. 3d 148 (Fla. 2012)