From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jul 25, 2014
143 So. 3d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Summary

recognizing that a trial court's ruling on a rule 3.800(c) motion is not subject to review on appeal

Summary of this case from Hauter v. State

Opinion

No. 5D14–1611.

2014-07-25

Eddie Lee DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Renee A. Roche, Judge. Eddie Lee Daniels, Lowell, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Renee A. Roche, Judge.
Eddie Lee Daniels, Lowell, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Eddie Lee Daniels, seeks review of the trial court's denial of his motion for reduction or modification of sentence brought pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). Because the ruling on this motion is not subject to review on appeal, we dismiss. Lee v. State, 108 So.3d 718 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013); Adams v. State, 800 So.2d 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

The trial judge, in her order, inadvertently advised appellant that if he wished to appeal, he had to do so within thirty days of the date of the order.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

TORPY, C.J., SAWAYA and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.




Summaries of

Daniels v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Jul 25, 2014
143 So. 3d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

recognizing that a trial court's ruling on a rule 3.800(c) motion is not subject to review on appeal

Summary of this case from Hauter v. State
Case details for

Daniels v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eddie Lee DANIELS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Jul 25, 2014

Citations

143 So. 3d 476 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Citing Cases

Hauter v. State

We take no position on the merits of the motion to mitigate sentences. See generally Daniels v. State, 143…